SUBHASH KISANRAO DONGRE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/208/2016
Case under Mah.university Act 1994. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030081362016
Filing Number
CP/6356/2016
Filing Date
26-Feb-2016
Registration No
CP/208/2016
Registration Date
29-Mar-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHASH KISANRAO DONGRE AND OTHERS
Adv. DUBE NIKHIL P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of this contempt petition after finding that the contempt order had already been complied with by the respondents. No representation appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2020
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
According To Sitting List
-
27-Jun-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. ShindeView PDF
-
24-Jun-2016
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde
-
18-Apr-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. ShindeView PDF
-
18-Apr-2016
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde
-
30-Mar-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. ShindeView PDF
-
30-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CP/208/2016
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of this contempt petition after finding that the contempt order had already been complied with by the respondents. No representation appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts