KAVITA SANDIP BHAGAT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/276/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030080022026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

WP/2055/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/276/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAVITA SANDIP BHAGAT

    Adv. Murkute J.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Sahebrao Bajirao Mhaske

  3. 3.Suresh Ramchandra Dhas

  4. 4.Dadasaheb Narhari Chitale

  5. 5.Babasaheb Rambhau Mhaske

  6. 6.Sharad Bhaurao Giri

  7. 7.Ayub Khajabhai Shaikh

  8. 8.Nitin Ramesh Giri

  9. 9.Rajendra Sukhdev Mhaske

  10. 10.Sanjay Pandhari Chandanshiv

  11. 11.Madhukar Shivram Mhaske

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/276/2026 - Kavita Sandip Bhagat v. State of Maharashtra The petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 03.07.2026. The APP waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the matter to proceed without formal service on respondent No.1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/276/2026 - Kavita Sandip Bhagat v. State of Maharashtra The petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 03.07.2026. The APP waived service of notice on behalf of the State, allowing the matter to proceed without formal service on respondent No.1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case