BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COM. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER, PUNE DESHMUKH MOHIT RAMESHRAO vs SAYED KALIM SAYED MOIN AND ANOTHER — CA/4611/2026
Case under Indian Partnership Act 1932 Section 73. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030078592026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
CA/5834/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
CA/4611/2026
Registration Date
18-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
OTHER APPEALS - SINGLE BENCH ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COM. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER, PUNE DESHMUKH MOHIT RAMESHRAO
Respondent(s)
SAYED KALIM SAYED MOIN AND ANOTHER
MAJEED KHAN WAHED KHAN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 23-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA/4611/2026 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance sought to stay execution of a Labour Court award dated 10-06-2025 awarding compensation to respondents Sayed Kalim and Majeed Khan. The insurance company argued substantial questions of law existed regarding injury classification under Schedule II of the Employees' Compensation Act and the multiplier applied. The court allowed the application, permitting the stay of the award on condition that the respondent claimant be permitted to withdraw the compensation amount already deposited by the insurance company before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA/4611/2026 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance sought to stay execution of a Labour Court award dated 10-06-2025 awarding compensation to respondents Sayed Kalim and Majeed Khan. The insurance company argued substantial questions of law existed regarding injury classification under Schedule II of the Employees' Compensation Act and the multiplier applied. The court allowed the application, permitting the stay of the award on condition that the respondent claimant be permitted to withdraw the compensation amount already deposited by the insurance company before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts