SOMNATH RAJARAM CHITALKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/270/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030077932026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
WP/2005/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/270/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOMNATH RAJARAM CHITALKAR
Adv. Dr. Nandedkar Sahebrao G.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
-
2.THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NASHIK RANGE
-
3.THE SUPRETENDENT OF POLICE
-
4.THE POLICE INSPECTOR
-
5.PRAHLAD BHANUDAS GITE
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
In Criminal Writ Petition No. 270/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case. The APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) sought time to take instructions from the State, and the court stood over the matter to 17.06.2026 for further hearing. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/270/2026
In Criminal Writ Petition No. 270/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case. The APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) sought time to take instructions from the State, and the court stood over the matter to 17.06.2026 for further hearing. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts