BABASAHEB NIVRUTTI SOLSE DEVAKATE ANANT R- AND GAIKWAD SANTOSH P vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5780/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19AND226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030077412021
Filing Number
WP/6413/2021
Filing Date
18-Feb-2021
Registration No
WP/5780/2021
Registration Date
01-Apr-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Bench Type
Division
Category
SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABASAHEB NIVRUTTI SOLSE DEVAKATE ANANT R- AND GAIKWAD SANTOSH P
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. AGP for Resp. No. 1 (waives).,Resp. No. 2 to 4 are served.,DHEPLE SHANTARAM R. FOR R.NO. 3,GHODE MADHAV C FOR R.NO. 4 1123
-
2.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Adv. Gaikwad A.B.
-
4.THE VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: WP/5780/2021 The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition, directing the Zilla Parishad to issue an appointment order to petitioner Babasaheb Nivrutti Solse for the Junior Assistant (Clerk) post in District Services Class III. The petitioner had been illegally terminated in 2017 and reinstated by the Labour Court in 2019 with service continuity and 50% back wages. Since the Labour Court bridged the service gap caused by unauthorized absence, the court held the petitioner legally qualified for the 10% promotion quota reserved for Village Panchayat employees with 10+ years continuous service, provided no subsequent misconduct occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Oct-2023
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
09-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
11-Jan-2023
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
-
07-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
-
18-Oct-2022
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
13-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
13-Sep-2022
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
22-Aug-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
13-Jul-2021
For Orders - Copies Not Supplied -CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni
-
20-Apr-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. KulkarniView PDF
-
20-Apr-2021
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni
-
05-Apr-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. KulkarniView PDF
-
05-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5780/2021
Case Summary: WP/5780/2021 The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition, directing the Zilla Parishad to issue an appointment order to petitioner Babasaheb Nivrutti Solse for the Junior Assistant (Clerk) post in District Services Class III. The petitioner had been illegally terminated in 2017 and reinstated by the Labour Court in 2019 with service continuity and 50% back wages. Since the Labour Court bridged the service gap caused by unauthorized absence, the court held the petitioner legally qualified for the 10% promotion quota reserved for Village Panchayat employees with 10+ years continuous service, provided no subsequent misconduct occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts