VIJAYABAI LAXMANRAO SHINDE BHOSLE SANTOSH CHATRAPATI vs GANPATRAO AMRUTRAO JADHAV AND OTHERS — HCBM30077182026

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM030077182026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

SA/5722/2026

Filing Date

21-02-2026

Judge

SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

Coram

SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

VIJAYABAI LAXMANRAO SHINDE BHOSLE SANTOSH CHATRAPATI

Respondent(s)

GANPATRAO AMRUTRAO JADHAV AND OTHERS

PADMINBAI GANPATRAO JADHAV

KAMALBAI GANPATRAO JADHAV

PANJAB GANPATRAO JADHAV

SANJAY GANPATRAO JADHAV

MANGALBAI PRALHAD HIVRALE

PRABHABAI DADARAO DHAVALE

SANGEETA ANANDRAO JADHAV

ANITA MAROTRAO GAIKWAD

DATTAPRASAD NITIN JADHAV

RAVIKIRAN KISHOR JADHAV

CHAKRADHAR KISHOR JADHAV

BANARASBAI NITIN JADHAV

KAMALBAI KISHOR JADHAV

Hearing History

Judge: SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

01-04-2026

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

Orders

15-04-2026
SHRI PRADEEP B. GHUGE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to appellants/applicants to remove office objections from multiple Second Appeals and Civil Applications filed in 2026. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference, as this was the third listing and previous extensions were not utilized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to appellants/applicants to remove office objections from multiple Second Appeals and Civil Applications filed in 2026. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference, as this was the third listing and previous extensions were not utilized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case