SHANTABAI SATYANARAYAN JAISWAL vs THE COLLECTOR OF AURANGABAD STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER — WP/3403/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030076812026

Filing Number

WP/5692/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/3403/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949
Mah.country Liquor Rules 1973

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTABAI SATYANARAYAN JAISWAL

    Adv. ARVIND KESHAVLAL TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COLLECTOR OF AURANGABAD STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE EXCISE AURANGABAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shantabai Satyanarayan Jaiswal challenging the suspension of her excise license by accepting the State Excise Department's undertaking to pass a final decision within four weeks from the date of judgment. The court kept all contentions open, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies if the final decision is unsatisfactory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3403/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shantabai Satyanarayan Jaiswal challenging the suspension of her excise license by accepting the State Excise Department's undertaking to pass a final decision within four weeks from the date of judgment. The court kept all contentions open, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies if the final decision is unsatisfactory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case