THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR vs DIGAMBAR DATTATRAY GABALE — CA/5356/2011
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM030075932011
Filing Number
CA/6194/2011
Filing Date
05-Mar-2011
Registration No
CA/5356/2011
Registration Date
25-Apr-2011
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR
Adv. Govt. Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIGAMBAR DATTATRAY GABALE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's First Appeal against a Land Reference Court's compensation award. Following a 2016 State Government policy decision not to contest appeals where the Reference Court's compensation award is within four times the SLAO amount, the court allowed the appeal to be disposed of without substantive adjudication, finding the compensation fell within this policy threshold. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Oct-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
08-Nov-2011
For Orders [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. V. Potdar
-
04-Oct-2011
For Orders -Unserved Notice-CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Mridula Bhatkar
-
23-Aug-2011
For Orders [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Mridula Bhatkar
-
26-Jul-2011
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. BordeView PDF
-
26-Jul-2011
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2011
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5356/2011
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's First Appeal against a Land Reference Court's compensation award. Following a 2016 State Government policy decision not to contest appeals where the Reference Court's compensation award is within four times the SLAO amount, the court allowed the appeal to be disposed of without substantive adjudication, finding the compensation fell within this policy threshold. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts