PRIYA RAVIKANT KOLHE vs RAVIKANT CHANDRAKANT KOLHE — FCA/28/2020
Case under Family Court Act 1985. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030072622020
Next Hearing
14th September 2020
Filing Number
FCA/5706/2020
Filing Date
11-02-2020
Registration No
FCA/28/2020
Registration Date
03-09-2020
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
MUTUAL CONSENT ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRIYA RAVIKANT KOLHE
Respondent(s)
RAVIKANT CHANDRAKANT KOLHE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
NOTIFICATION
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-09-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 06-02-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Family Court Appeal No. 28 of 2020 filed by Priya Ravikant Kolhe against Ravikant Chandrakant Kolhe on 17 April 2026. The court found that the appellant's advocate had sought withdrawal of the power of attorney, and when the court issued a notice to the appellant, it was returned unserved as she was not residing at the provided address. The bailiff's report confirmed the appellant's father stated she was not residing with him and her current whereabouts were unknown. Based on this apparent lack of interest in pursuing the appeal, the court dismissed the family court appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Family Court Appeal No. 28 of 2020 filed by Priya Ravikant Kolhe against Ravikant Chandrakant Kolhe on 17 April 2026. The court found that the appellant's advocate had sought withdrawal of the power of attorney, and when the court issued a notice to the appellant, it was returned unserved as she was not residing at the provided address. The bailiff's report confirmed the appellant's father stated she was not residing with him and her current whereabouts were unknown. Based on this apparent lack of interest in pursuing the appeal, the court dismissed the family court appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts