RAJU BANDU PENDARKAR KULKARNI SUNIKET ANIL AND RUTUJA L. JAKHADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/3027/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 21 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030069742026
Filing Number
WP/5146/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
WP/3027/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJU BANDU PENDARKAR KULKARNI SUNIKET ANIL AND RUTUJA L. JAKHADE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
THE CEO NANDURBAR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL NANDURBAR
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERING
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 07-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 3027 of 2026 filed by Raju Bandu Pendarkar against the State of Maharashtra. After the court indicated its disinclination to grant relief to the petitioner, the petitioner's advocate sought withdrawal of the petition, which was granted and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 3027 of 2026 filed by Raju Bandu Pendarkar against the State of Maharashtra. After the court indicated its disinclination to grant relief to the petitioner, the petitioner's advocate sought withdrawal of the petition, which was granted and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts