KISHOR RAKHMAJI DHANWATE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3960/2020
Case under Mah.cons.of Holding & Prev.& Frag.act Section 226. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030069652020
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/5458/2020
Filing Date
10-02-2020
Registration No
WP/3960/2020
Registration Date
11-03-2020
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
AGRICULTURAL LAND CEILING ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHOR RAKHMAJI DHANWATE
Adv. Advocate- ,Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. K.D. BADE PATIL FOR R.NO. 5,AGP FOR R.NO 1 TO 4 1123
THE COLLECTOR
THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER
THE TAHSILDAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 12-03-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 14-07-2026 | |
| 14-03-2026 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 27-01-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned WP 3960/2020 to 14.07.2026. The petitioner's advocate must remove office objections within six weeks or the petition will be dismissed by default. Respondent No.5's advocate was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned WP 3960/2020 to 14.07.2026. The petitioner's advocate must remove office objections within six weeks or the petition will be dismissed by default. Respondent No.5's advocate was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts