KULGURU VASANTRAO NAIK MARATHWADA KRUSHI VIDYAPEETH PARBHANI AND ANOTHER JADHAV P. B. AND SHINDE P. M. vs RAGHUNATH DYANOBA KHARAT AND OTHERS — WP/3386/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030068752026

Filing Number

WP/5084/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/3386/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULGURU VASANTRAO NAIK MARATHWADA KRUSHI VIDYAPEETH PARBHANI AND ANOTHER JADHAV P. B. AND SHINDE P. M.

  2. 2.INCHARGE OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAGHUNATH DYANOBA KHARAT AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAJESH KISHORILAL KHANDELWAL FOR R.NO. 1 TO 4 1123

  2. 2.SHRIMATI CHANDRAKALA RAGHUNATH KHARAT

  3. 3.SHRIMATI CHANDRAKALA DADARAO KHARAT

  4. 4.SHRIMATI LATABAI JALINDAR WARE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Summary: Writ Petition No. 3386 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) was directed to be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 2222 of 2019. The respondent's counsel waived notice, and the petitioners were granted liberty to move for interim relief pending the final hearing of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3386/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Writ Petition No. 3386 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) was directed to be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 2222 of 2019. The respondent's counsel waived notice, and the petitioners were granted liberty to move for interim relief pending the final hearing of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case