BHASKAR ONKAR MALI AND ANOTHER PATIL VINOD PRAKASH vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR — CA/2411/2025
Case under Arbitration Act 1940 Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030066502025
e-Filing Number
26-01-2025
Filing Number
CA/5114/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
CA/2411/2025
Registration Date
27-02-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHASKAR ONKAR MALI AND ANOTHER PATIL VINOD PRAKASH
SUNIL RAGHUNATH MALI
Adv. PATIL VINOD PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-02-2025 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 25-03-2026 | |
| 24-03-2026 | |
| 23-03-2026 |
Orders
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad (dated 07/05/2026) allowed arbitration appeals filed by NHAI and permitted claimants Bhaskar Onkar Mali and others to withdraw awarded amounts. The court directed the registry to divide and deposit cheques individually to each claimant according to their equal shares, as they maintained separate accounts rather than a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad (dated 07/05/2026) allowed arbitration appeals filed by NHAI and permitted claimants Bhaskar Onkar Mali and others to withdraw awarded amounts. The court directed the registry to divide and deposit cheques individually to each claimant according to their equal shares, as they maintained separate accounts rather than a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts