KADU FATRU KOLI AND ANOTHER PATIL VINOD PRAKASH vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR AND ANR. — CA/2224/2025

Case under Arbitration Act 1940 Section 126. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030066362025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

26-01-2025

Filing Number

CA/5104/2025

Filing Date

12-02-2025

Registration No

CA/2224/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act 1940 Section 126

Petitioner(s)

KADU FATRU KOLI AND ANOTHER PATIL VINOD PRAKASH

ARUN FATRU KOLI

Adv. PATIL VINOD PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR AND ANR.

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISTION

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

28-02-2025

URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)

23-04-2026
18-03-2026
02-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE

12-09-2025

FOR ORDERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed NHAI's arbitration appeals and the claimants' withdrawal applications in CA/2224/2025 and related cases. The court directed the registry to divide the awarded amount equally among the individual claimants and deposit separate cheques in their individual accounts, as they do not maintain a joint account and each claimant holds equal shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed NHAI's arbitration appeals and the claimants' withdrawal applications in CA/2224/2025 and related cases. The court directed the registry to divide the awarded amount equally among the individual claimants and deposit separate cheques in their individual accounts, as they do not maintain a joint account and each claimant holds equal shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case