SHAIKH FAKIR MOHAMMED SHAIKH DIWAN vs LAXMAN KASNYA RATHOD AND OTHERS — WP/2251/2018
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030063002018
Next Hearing
12th April 2018
Filing Number
WP/4941/2018
Filing Date
14-02-2018
Registration No
WP/2251/2018
Registration Date
23-02-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIKH FAKIR MOHAMMED SHAIKH DIWAN
Adv. Advocate- DESHMUKH VIJAY VASANTRAO FOR PETITIONER
Respondent(s)
LAXMAN KASNYA RATHOD AND OTHERS
Adv. ,ADE RAVINDRA B. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR PRODUCTION
NOTIFICATION
PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-04-2018 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 16-04-2018 | FOR PRODUCTION |
| 09-04-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 06-05-2026 | PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 05-05-2026 | PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE V.L. ACHLIYA
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition, upholding that disputed land (Gut No. 112) is Government property and rejecting the petitioner's claim to ownership based on long-term cultivation, but quashed the Minister's order directing regularization of the respondents' encroachment as legally unsustainable and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. The Court directed the District Collector to remove all encroachments following due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition, upholding that disputed land (Gut No. 112) is Government property and rejecting the petitioner's claim to ownership based on long-term cultivation, but quashed the Minister's order directing regularization of the respondents' encroachment as legally unsustainable and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. The Court directed the District Collector to remove all encroachments following due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts