HAMID JABBAR KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/218/2018
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030062182018
Next Hearing
16th April 2018
Filing Number
CP/4879/2018
Filing Date
13-02-2018
Registration No
CP/218/2018
Registration Date
06-04-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAMID JABBAR KHAN
Adv. Bhosale Sanjaykumar B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. R/4 AND 6 SERVED.,RAUT RAJDEEP D. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
NOTIFICATION
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-07-2018 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 31-08-2018 | FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-03-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 21-09-2018 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 16-04-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the contempt petition filed by Hamid Jabbar Khan. The court found that while the petitioner was previously allowed to make representations if no departmental enquiry was initiated, a departmental enquiry against him had already been commenced, rendering the petition moot. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as nothing further survived for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the contempt petition filed by Hamid Jabbar Khan. The court found that while the petitioner was previously allowed to make representations if no departmental enquiry was initiated, a departmental enquiry against him had already been commenced, rendering the petition moot. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as nothing further survived for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts