RAGHUNATH SHANKAR PATIL THR HIS GPA HOLDER ISHWAR RAGHNATH PATIL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALGAON AND OTHERS — WP/1676/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 R/W227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030061452026
Filing Number
WP/4562/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
WP/1676/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAGHUNATH SHANKAR PATIL THR HIS GPA HOLDER ISHWAR RAGHNATH PATIL AND OTHERS
Adv. PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO
KAMALBAI RAGHUNATH PATIL
SHOBHABAI ISHWAR PATIL THR ITS GPA HOLDER ISHWAR RAGHUNATH PATIL
ASHOK HIMMAT WAGHE
RAMKRUSHNA LAXMAN CHAUDHARI CHAVAN
MISHRILAL HIRACHAND TELI
BHAGWAN MANIK DHAKARE
BHAGABAI MANIK THAKRE DIED THR LRS SHIVCHARAN MANIK THAKRE
RANJANA NARENDRA NAIK THR HER GPA HOLDER MANOJ NARENDRA NAIK
RAVINDRA MADHUKAR NAIK THR HIS GPA HOLDER MANOJ NARENDRA NAIK
UJAWALA RAJENDRA NAIK THR HER GPA HOLDER MANOJ NARENDRA NAIK
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALGAON AND OTHERS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MINOR IRRIGATION
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M. I. W. JALGAON
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT / ORDERS - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT / ORDERS - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/1676/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed a writ petition challenging a reference court's directions to file FIR/complaints against land claimants and their advocates for document forgery. The petitioners challenged the directions issued during land acquisition proceedings for an irrigation tank, arguing they received no prior hearing. The court upheld the directions, holding that no statutory requirement mandates a hearing before initiating criminal proceedings under Section 340 CrPC, as natural justice principles don't apply at the complaint stage. The reference court had found sufficient evidence that forged reference letters and manipulated documents were presented in multiple land acquisition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/1676/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed a writ petition challenging a reference court's directions to file FIR/complaints against land claimants and their advocates for document forgery. The petitioners challenged the directions issued during land acquisition proceedings for an irrigation tank, arguing they received no prior hearing. The court upheld the directions, holding that no statutory requirement mandates a hearing before initiating criminal proceedings under Section 340 CrPC, as natural justice principles don't apply at the complaint stage. The reference court had found sufficient evidence that forged reference letters and manipulated documents were presented in multiple land acquisition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts