KISHOR BABURAO PATIL CHAVAN VISHAL BHIMRAO AND PRASAD RAJAPURKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/1660/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 R/W 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030061372026
Filing Number
WP/4555/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
WP/1660/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHOR BABURAO PATIL CHAVAN VISHAL BHIMRAO AND PRASAD RAJAPURKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER JALGAON
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M. I. W. JALGAON
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT / ORDERS - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT / ORDERS - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/1660/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by advocate Kishor Baburao Patil Chavan against directions issued by the Reference Court to lodge FIR and file criminal complaints for forged documents. The court upheld the lower court's findings that the petitioner and claimants presented fabricated land acquisition reference letters to obtain compensation enhancement, holding that no prior hearing was statutorily required before issuing such directions under Section 340 CrPC/Section 379 BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/1660/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by advocate Kishor Baburao Patil Chavan against directions issued by the Reference Court to lodge FIR and file criminal complaints for forged documents. The court upheld the lower court's findings that the petitioner and claimants presented fabricated land acquisition reference letters to obtain compensation enhancement, holding that no prior hearing was statutorily required before issuing such directions under Section 340 CrPC/Section 379 BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts