GOPAL VITTHALRAO BAGADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/2168/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Feb-2017

CNR: HCBM030059352017

Filing Number

WP/4664/2017

Filing Date

13-Feb-2017

Registration No

WP/2168/2017

Registration Date

14-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL VITTHALRAO BAGADE

    Adv. Advocate- ,TEKALE NIKHIL S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 AND 2,R/ 3 TO 9 SERVED,Jadhavar Kiran B.,Kore Ganesh J,Kore Ganesh J,G.J. Kore for R.Nos.4Ai to 4Aiv and 4B, 4C. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner's grievance was not amenable to writ jurisdiction and that a civil suit before a competent Civil Court would be the appropriate remedy. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file a civil suit, with interim arrangements remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 07-Aug-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  6. 27-Apr-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  7. 25-Jan-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  8. 01-Dec-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  9. 06-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. SuryawanshiView PDF

  10. 06-Oct-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  11. 06-Sep-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  12. 12-Aug-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  13. 22-Jul-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  14. 30-Jun-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  15. 16-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. SuryawanshiView PDF

  16. 16-Jun-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  17. 25-Apr-2022

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  18. 28-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF

  19. 25-Mar-2022

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  20. 02-Mar-2022

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  21. 23-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish DangreView PDF

  22. 17-Apr-2020

    Urgent Circulation - CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  23. 04-Mar-2020

    Urgent Circulation - CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  24. 21-Aug-2017

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  25. 25-Jul-2017

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh

  26. 27-Jun-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF

  27. 27-Jun-2017

    Urgent Circulation -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh

  28. 03-Apr-2017

    Urgent Circulation -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  29. 15-Mar-2017

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. B. Shukre

  30. 15-Feb-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. B. ShukreView PDF

  31. 15-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 13-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2168/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner's grievance was not amenable to writ jurisdiction and that a civil suit before a competent Civil Court would be the appropriate remedy. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file a civil suit, with interim arrangements remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case