GOPAL VITTHALRAO BAGADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/2168/2017
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030059352017
Next Hearing
15th February 2017
Filing Number
WP/4664/2017
Filing Date
13-02-2017
Registration No
WP/2168/2017
Registration Date
14-02-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOPAL VITTHALRAO BAGADE
Adv. Advocate- ,TEKALE NIKHIL S
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 AND 2,R/ 3 TO 9 SERVED,Jadhavar Kiran B.,Kore Ganesh J,Kore Ganesh J,G.J. Kore for R.Nos.4Ai to 4Aiv and 4B, 4C. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-06-2017 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 04-03-2020 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 15-03-2017 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 15-02-2017 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 17-04-2020 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner's grievance was not amenable to writ jurisdiction and that a civil suit before a competent Civil Court would be the appropriate remedy. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file a civil suit, with interim arrangements remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner's grievance was not amenable to writ jurisdiction and that a civil suit before a competent Civil Court would be the appropriate remedy. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to file a civil suit, with interim arrangements remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts