ATMARAM RAJARAM GHUGE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CA/7437/2019

Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030058112018

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

CA/4556/2018

Filing Date

09-02-2018

Registration No

CA/7437/2019

Registration Date

01-07-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

ATMARAM RAJARAM GHUGE

Adv. KULKARNI RASHMI S.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. COPY SERVED ON ADV A P BHANDARI FOR R-6 IN WP 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

16-09-2020

FOR ORDERS

12-06-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

17-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

06-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

06-03-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Summary: In Civil Application No. 7437 of 2019 (filed in Writ Petition 11541/2014), the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad adjourned the case to 12.06.2026 at the request of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6's advocate for filing their reply. The court directed that the reply be filed positively before the next date with an advance copy provided to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Application No. 7437 of 2019 (filed in Writ Petition 11541/2014), the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad adjourned the case to 12.06.2026 at the request of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6's advocate for filing their reply. The court directed that the reply be filed positively before the next date with an advance copy provided to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case