MAHADU BHUTA BORSE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/2576/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030058092026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/4322/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

WP/2576/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
LAND ACQUISITION ACT 1894 - WRIT PET Section ---

Petitioner(s)

MAHADU BHUTA BORSE AND OTHERS

Adv. PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO,PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO FOR PET.NO. 2 TO 4 AND 6,PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO FOR PET.NO. 2 TO 4 AND 6, PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO FOR PET.NO. 2 TO 4 AND

DHONDU GOBA PATIL

SHANKAR DHONDU PATIL

RINKU SUNIL MARATHE

YAMUNABAI GARBAD NANNAWARE

SHYAM OMKAR PATIL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALGAON

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISITIO SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MSRDC

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WORKS DEPARTMENT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR

10-03-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

01-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) permitted withdrawal of the writ petition challenging State Highway No. 40 expansion affecting petitioners' lands, as the petitioner's advocate failed to annex necessary documents initially. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition with complete documentation, noting that all supporting documents should have been attached with the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) permitted withdrawal of the writ petition challenging State Highway No. 40 expansion affecting petitioners' lands, as the petitioner's advocate failed to annex necessary documents initially. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition with complete documentation, noting that all supporting documents should have been attached with the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case