BANSILAL SHANKARLAL MODANI vs SHRINIWAS SHANKARLAL MODANI THROUGH LRS RAMPRASAD THR LRS NIRMALABAI RAMPRASAD MODANI AND OTHERS — WP/3525/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030057922019

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

08th April 2019

Filing Number

WP/4422/2019

Filing Date

07-02-2019

Registration No

WP/3525/2019

Registration Date

12-03-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

BANSILAL SHANKARLAL MODANI

Adv. Bhamre Manish V

Respondent(s)

SHRINIWAS SHANKARLAL MODANI THROUGH LRS RAMPRASAD THR LRS NIRMALABAI RAMPRASAD MODANI AND OTHERS

Adv. ,Chandak Raviraj R. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

03-07-2019

DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]

10-06-2019

DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]

08-06-2020

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

16-03-2020

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

08-04-2019

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

24-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection order. The petitioner, a co-sharer in ancestral property acquired for the Manjara Project, was entitled to be impleaded as a party in the land acquisition reference proceedings, as he had demonstrated clear interest in the property and had consented to compensation withdrawal, despite not filing a separate application before the Collector. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection order. The petitioner, a co-sharer in ancestral property acquired for the Manjara Project, was entitled to be impleaded as a party in the land acquisition reference proceedings, as he had demonstrated clear interest in the property and had consented to compensation withdrawal, despite not filing a separate application before the Collector. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case