SHWETA JAITUN VALVI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/2650/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030057472026
Filing Number
WP/4286/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
WP/2650/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHWETA JAITUN VALVI
Adv. SYED AZIZODDIN R.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
THE COMMISSIONER TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THE ADDL COMMISSIONER TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THE PROJECT OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 01-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 27-03-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 (State of Maharashtra) to decide the petitioner's representations dated 04.12.2023 and 19.01.2026 within four weeks from the judgment date. The court accepted an undertaking from the State's representative to this effect, thereby providing the petitioner relief through a time-bound directive rather than substantive adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 (State of Maharashtra) to decide the petitioner's representations dated 04.12.2023 and 19.01.2026 within four weeks from the judgment date. The court accepted an undertaking from the State's representative to this effect, thereby providing the petitioner relief through a time-bound directive rather than substantive adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts