PALLAVI SACHIN KANSE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/96/2026

Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14-A, 3(5), 3(2)(va). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 22nd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030055422026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

APEAL/1391/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

APEAL/96/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14-A, 3(5), 3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108, 115(2), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

PALLAVI SACHIN KANSE

Adv. Shinde Namdev Shatrughan

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Adv. R/2 SERVED,WAKODE AMOLKUMAR SAMADHAN FOR R/2 1123

Kirankumar Shrimant Patole

Adv. WAKODE AMOLKUMAR SAMADHAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

21-04-2026

URGENT CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL APPEALS)

07-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)

01-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)

25-03-2026

DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)

16-03-2026

DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)

Orders

22-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed bail appeals by two school employees charged with abetting a student's suicide. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence that the appellants instigated or abetted the victim to commit suicide, noting the post-mortem showed only neck injuries and witness statements revealed the victim was merely punished for misconduct. The appellants were released on bail of Rs. 1 lakh each with conditions prohibiting hostel access and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed bail appeals by two school employees charged with abetting a student's suicide. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence that the appellants instigated or abetted the victim to commit suicide, noting the post-mortem showed only neck injuries and witness statements revealed the victim was merely punished for misconduct. The appellants were released on bail of Rs. 1 lakh each with conditions prohibiting hostel access and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case