DILIP NANA ALIAS NANABHAU JADHAV AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3877/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030055302026
Filing Number
WP/4140/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
WP/3877/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DILIP NANA ALIAS NANABHAU JADHAV AND OTHERS
Adv. KANADE ANGAD LALA
NARAYAN DHONDIBA JADHAV DIED THROUGH LRS PRYAGBAI NARAYAN JADHAV
GANPAT MESA JADHAV DIED THROUGH LRS SAMPAT GANPAT JADHAV
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALNA
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PARTUR MANTHA
THE TAHSILDAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the petition seeking direct regularization of Gairan land by directing the District Collector to consider the petitioners' claims in accordance with applicable Government Resolutions (1991 and 2011) within four months. The court held that it cannot grant regularization directly but must remit the matter to the administrative authority, which must conduct a survey, issue notices to all affected parties, and pass a reasoned decision based on law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the petition seeking direct regularization of Gairan land by directing the District Collector to consider the petitioners' claims in accordance with applicable Government Resolutions (1991 and 2011) within four months. The court held that it cannot grant regularization directly but must remit the matter to the administrative authority, which must conduct a survey, issue notices to all affected parties, and pass a reasoned decision based on law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts