DHONDIRAM RAMBHAU JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3880/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030055232026
Filing Number
WP/4136/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/3880/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHONDIRAM RAMBHAU JADHAV
Adv. KANADE ANGAD LALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALNA
-
3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PARTUR
-
4.THE TAHSILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition seeking direct regularization of Gairan land by directing the District Collector to independently consider the petitioner's claim within four months in accordance with Government Resolutions dated 28.11.1991 and 12.07.2011. The court held that it cannot grant regularization directly but must remit the matter to the Collector, who must follow the procedural requirements including issuing notices, conducting surveys, and providing hearing opportunities to all affected parties as per earlier precedent (PIL No.127 of 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3880/2026
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition seeking direct regularization of Gairan land by directing the District Collector to independently consider the petitioner's claim within four months in accordance with Government Resolutions dated 28.11.1991 and 12.07.2011. The court held that it cannot grant regularization directly but must remit the matter to the Collector, who must follow the procedural requirements including issuing notices, conducting surveys, and providing hearing opportunities to all affected parties as per earlier precedent (PIL No.127 of 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts