TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., LEGAL MANAGAR, PUNE ABHIJIT CHOUDHARI vs JEHARBHAI DIVALYA VASAVE (PADAVI) AND OTEHRS — CA/1744/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030054532026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
CA/4072/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
CA/1744/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., LEGAL MANAGAR, PUNE ABHIJIT CHOUDHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.JEHARBHAI DIVALYA VASAVE (PADAVI) AND OTEHRS
-
2.DILIP DIYALYA KUVAR PADAVI
-
3.RAMESH DIVALYA PADAVI
-
4.DINESH DIVALYA PADAVI
-
5.VINESH DIVALYA PADAVI
-
6.SHRI JAYESH RAVINDRA PATIL
-
7.BHUMIKA KIRAN PATIL
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
Summary: Civil Application No. 1744/2026 filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. against Jeharbhai Divalya Vasave and others in the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) was adjourned on 5th May 2026. The court ordered notice to be awaited and the case to stand over to 14th July 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/1744/2026
Summary: Civil Application No. 1744/2026 filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. against Jeharbhai Divalya Vasave and others in the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) was adjourned on 5th May 2026. The court ordered notice to be awaited and the case to stand over to 14th July 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts