KAILAS PURNAJI AHER AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH REVENUE DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — WP/2057/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030052242026
Filing Number
WP/3888/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/2057/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAILAS PURNAJI AHER AND OTHERS
Adv. Khoche Shubham S.
-
2.PRAKASH PURNAJI AHER
-
3.VANITA SANJAY AHER
-
4.RAHUL SANJAY AHER
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH REVENUE DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE COLLECTOR CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR
-
4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER SILLOD
-
5.THE TAHSILDAR SILLOD
-
6.DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORD
-
7.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORD SILLOD
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned Writ Petition No. 2057 of 2026 to April 7, 2026. The court noted that petitioners failed to comply with the previously permitted amendment and granted an extension of time for the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
10-Mar-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2057/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned Writ Petition No. 2057 of 2026 to April 7, 2026. The court noted that petitioners failed to comply with the previously permitted amendment and granted an extension of time for the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts