SHAIKH RAHEMAN SHAIKH AMIR AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4848/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030051142026
Filing Number
WP/3812/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/4848/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH RAHEMAN SHAIKH AMIR AND ANOTHER
Adv. Kale Ajeet B.
-
2.SHAIKH TAJMAHAMAD SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE COLLECTOR JALGAON
-
4.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
-
6.SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shaikh Raheman and another challenging non-execution of a 2023 judgment and award. The court found the writ petition procedurally improper since execution petitions were already pending, and directed the executing court to take appropriate steps for execution as early as possible instead of entertaining the writ petition under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4848/2026
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shaikh Raheman and another challenging non-execution of a 2023 judgment and award. The court found the writ petition procedurally improper since execution petitions were already pending, and directed the executing court to take appropriate steps for execution as early as possible instead of entertaining the writ petition under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts