SHAIKH RAHEMAN SHAIKH AMIR AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4848/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030051142026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/3812/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

WP/4848/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

SHAIKH RAHEMAN SHAIKH AMIR AND ANOTHER

Adv. Kale Ajeet B.

SHAIKH TAJMAHAMAD SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT

THE COLLECTOR JALGAON

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

04-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shaikh Raheman and another challenging non-execution of a 2023 judgment and award. The court found the writ petition procedurally improper since execution petitions were already pending, and directed the executing court to take appropriate steps for execution as early as possible instead of entertaining the writ petition under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Shaikh Raheman and another challenging non-execution of a 2023 judgment and award. The court found the writ petition procedurally improper since execution petitions were already pending, and directed the executing court to take appropriate steps for execution as early as possible instead of entertaining the writ petition under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case