GOVARDHAN MOHANLAL VIYAS SHARMA vs MOHAMMAED WASIM FAROOQUI AND ANOTHER Advocate - Rathi Swapnil S., R/1 SERVED — CA/3157/2015
Case under Act Not Known. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030050392015
Next Hearing
10th March 2015
Filing Number
CA/3879/2015
Filing Date
06-02-2015
Registration No
CA/3157/2015
Registration Date
05-03-2015
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVARDHAN MOHANLAL VIYAS SHARMA
Adv. ZIA UL MUSTAFA
Respondent(s)
MOHAMMAED WASIM FAROOQUI AND ANOTHER Advocate - Rathi Swapnil S., R/1 SERVED
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
FOR SETTLEMENT - S
URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2020 | FOR SETTLEMENT - S |
| 10-03-2015 | URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a 2011 MACT award. Applicant Govardhan Sharma sought to appeal a tribunal decision that partially allowed his Rs. 3 lakh compensation claim for injuries from a 2008 road accident, awarding only Rs. 1.54 lakh, but filed 1156 days late. The court found no sufficient cause for the three-year delay, rejecting arguments of unawareness about appeal limitations and financial constraints, emphasizing protection of the insurance company's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a 2011 MACT award. Applicant Govardhan Sharma sought to appeal a tribunal decision that partially allowed his Rs. 3 lakh compensation claim for injuries from a 2008 road accident, awarding only Rs. 1.54 lakh, but filed 1156 days late. The court found no sufficient cause for the three-year delay, rejecting arguments of unawareness about appeal limitations and financial constraints, emphasizing protection of the insurance company's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts