SHRIKANT VISHWANATH PATIL AND OTHER SHARAD V. NATU AND S.R. KEDAR vs VYANKATRAO S/O VITTHALRAO PATIL AND ANR — HCBM30048732026
Case under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950 Section 47D. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM030048732026
Filing Number
FA/3641/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
Coram
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
OTHER APPEALS - SINGLE BENCH ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIKANT VISHWANATH PATIL AND OTHER SHARAD V. NATU AND S.R. KEDAR
-
2.OMKARAPPA S/O KALYAPPA MATHPATI,
Respondent(s)
-
1.VYANKATRAO S/O VITTHALRAO PATIL AND ANR
-
2.SUBHASH S/O MAHADAPPA SHIVPUJE,
-
3.RANJIT S/O SHIVRAJ PATIL
-
4.SHANKARRAO S/O MADHAVRAO BASAPURE
-
5.DNYANOBA S/O BALIRAM WANJE
-
6.OMKARBAI W/O DNYANOBA WANJE
-
7.SHIVRAJ MAHADEVRAO PATIL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Objections Not Removed (Third Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
24-Mar-2026
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)View PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted appellants a final two-week extension to remove office objections in multiple First Appeals and Cross Objections filed in 2026. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference, as appellants appeared disinterested despite being granted two previous extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Objections Not Removed (Second Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
17-Mar-2026
Objections Not Removed (First Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted appellants a final two-week extension to remove office objections in multiple First Appeals and Cross Objections filed in 2026. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference, as appellants appeared disinterested despite being granted two previous extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts