SHANKAR GENAJIRAO WANVE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/96/2016
Case under Mah.university Act 1994. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030047092016
Next Hearing
09th February 2016
Filing Number
CP/3664/2016
Filing Date
03-02-2016
Registration No
CP/96/2016
Registration Date
09-02-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHANKAR GENAJIRAO WANVE AND OTHERS
Adv. DUBE NIKHIL P.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/1,Dankh Sachin V.,R.4 & 5 SERVED 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PRODUCTION [ FRESH ]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2016 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 31-03-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 24-06-2016 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 18-04-2016 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 09-02-2016 | PRODUCTION [ FRESH ] |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the order under contempt had already been complied with by the respondents. Since compliance was achieved, no further action was necessary and the petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the order under contempt had already been complied with by the respondents. Since compliance was achieved, no further action was necessary and the petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts