SAYYAD YUNUS PACHULAL PATEL vs ACHYUT HANGE AND ANOTHER Advocate - Patil N.P. Jamalpurkar, R/2 SERVED — CP/95/2018
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030046762018
Next Hearing
07th February 2018
Filing Number
CP/3636/2018
Filing Date
02-02-2018
Registration No
CP/95/2018
Registration Date
06-02-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAYYAD YUNUS PACHULAL PATEL
Adv. Dr.TAWSHIKAR SWAPNIL D.
Respondent(s)
ACHYUT HANGE AND ANOTHER Advocate - Patil N.P. Jamalpurkar, R/2 SERVED
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
DUE ORDERS -CIVIL
FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-02-2020 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 15-04-2020 | DUE ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 06-07-2018 | FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 07-02-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 23-03-2018 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CP/95/2018 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition filed by Sayyad Yunus Pachulal Patel. The court inferred that since the original contempt order (dated 30.01.2017) merely directed the concerned authority to decide the petitioner's applications within 12 weeks, and the petitioner's subsequent absence from proceedings indicated compliance, the contempt petition was disposed of as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CP/95/2018 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition filed by Sayyad Yunus Pachulal Patel. The court inferred that since the original contempt order (dated 30.01.2017) merely directed the concerned authority to decide the petitioner's applications within 12 weeks, and the petitioner's subsequent absence from proceedings indicated compliance, the contempt petition was disposed of as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts