TUKARAM MADHAV MAHIPAL AND ANOTHER vs MEERA DINESH MAHIPAL AND OTHERS — WP/169/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030046282026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/1160/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/169/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUKARAM MADHAV MAHIPAL AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Chavan Kalyan S.

  2. 2.Dipak Tukaram Mahipal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEERA DINESH MAHIPAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Shivaji Madhav Mahipal

  3. 3.Krushna Ganpatrao Mahipal

  4. 4.Mathurabai Tukaram Mahipal

  5. 5.Shobha Dipak Mahipal

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) ordered the Court Office to accept the deposit of a demand draft of Rs. 75,000 from the petitioners, as per the previous order dated 15.04.2026. This appears to be a compliance hearing on the consolidated Criminal Writ Petitions No. 169 and 170 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) ordered the Court Office to accept the deposit of a demand draft of Rs. 75,000 from the petitioners, as per the previous order dated 15.04.2026. This appears to be a compliance hearing on the consolidated Criminal Writ Petitions No. 169 and 170 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case