AKSHAY RAVINDRA BORNARE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/1156/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,21,226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030044092026

Filing Number

WP/3294/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/1156/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,19,21,226 AND 227
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHAY RAVINDRA BORNARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. KULKARNI MUKUL S.

  2. 2.PRASHANT NANA BAVISKAR

  3. 3.MADHUKAR RATAN SAPKALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JALGAON

  4. 4.SHRI SHIVCHARAN MANIK THAKARE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/1156/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition filed by three advocates challenging a lower court's directions to lodge FIR/police reports and file complaints for alleged document forgery in land acquisition proceedings. The court quashed directions against petitioners 1 and 3, finding they were not practicing advocates when the forged documents were originally presented to court and merely signed vakalatnamas later to assist a senior advocate. However, the petition of petitioner 2 was dismissed as he practiced during the relevant period and appeared on vakalatnama alongside the advocate who presented the forged documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1156/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition filed by three advocates challenging a lower court's directions to lodge FIR/police reports and file complaints for alleged document forgery in land acquisition proceedings. The court quashed directions against petitioners 1 and 3, finding they were not practicing advocates when the forged documents were originally presented to court and merely signed vakalatnamas later to assist a senior advocate. However, the petition of petitioner 2 was dismissed as he practiced during the relevant period and appeared on vakalatnama alongside the advocate who presented the forged documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case