AKSHAY RAVINDRA BORNARE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS — WP/1156/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,21,226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030044092026
Filing Number
WP/3294/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
WP/1156/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKSHAY RAVINDRA BORNARE AND OTHERS
Adv. KULKARNI MUKUL S.
PRASHANT NANA BAVISKAR
MADHUKAR RATAN SAPKALE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JALGAON
SHRI SHIVCHARAN MANIK THAKARE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-02-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-05-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 11-02-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 09-02-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/1156/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition filed by three advocates challenging a lower court's directions to lodge FIR/police reports and file complaints for alleged document forgery in land acquisition proceedings. The court quashed directions against petitioners 1 and 3, finding they were not practicing advocates when the forged documents were originally presented to court and merely signed vakalatnamas later to assist a senior advocate. However, the petition of petitioner 2 was dismissed as he practiced during the relevant period and appeared on vakalatnama alongside the advocate who presented the forged documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/1156/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the writ petition filed by three advocates challenging a lower court's directions to lodge FIR/police reports and file complaints for alleged document forgery in land acquisition proceedings. The court quashed directions against petitioners 1 and 3, finding they were not practicing advocates when the forged documents were originally presented to court and merely signed vakalatnamas later to assist a senior advocate. However, the petition of petitioner 2 was dismissed as he practiced during the relevant period and appeared on vakalatnama alongside the advocate who presented the forged documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts