ASHOK LAXMAN BHUSARE DIED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS SINDHU ASHOK BHUSARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/9312/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030043442022
Filing Number
WP/3285/2022
Filing Date
31-01-2022
Registration No
WP/9312/2022
Registration Date
14-09-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Division
Category
SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOK LAXMAN BHUSARE DIED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS SINDHU ASHOK BHUSARE
Adv. SONAWANE MAHESH RAMNATH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. R. No. 11 served.,AGP for R. Nos. 1 to 5.,JAJU NIKHIL SANTOSH FOR R.NO. 6,8,9,Resp. Nos. 6 to 9, 10/A and 10/C are served.,KAKDE YUVRAJ VIJAYRAO FOR R.NO. 11,R. NOS. 10B, 10E AND 10D ARE SERVED,IMRAN KHAN GUFTAR KHAN DURRANI FOR R.NO. 10 (A) TO 10(E) 1123
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT LAND RECORD
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT LAND RECORD
THE TALUKA INSPECTOR OF LAND REOCORD
KESHAV SAKHARAM MHASKE
BABAN GANPAT BHUSARE
BHIMABAI KESHAVRAO MHASKE
SHANTABAI SHRIDHAR MHASKE
RAJMOHAMMAD RASOOL BAIG DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIRS RAJJAK RAMOHAMMAD BAIG
HARSHADA DADASAHEB KAKDE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME)
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-02-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 14-03-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 21-03-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME) |
| 11-04-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME) |
| 15-09-2022 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad remanded a land record dispute to the Deputy Director of Land Records for fresh reconsideration. The petitioner's legal heirs challenged the Minister of Revenue's 2020 order confirming a 2016 decision that reduced the deceased's landholding, relying on precedent established in WP No.13712/2017, which requires authorities to justify any reduction in land holdings. The court ordered a de novo hearing with proper opportunity to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad remanded a land record dispute to the Deputy Director of Land Records for fresh reconsideration. The petitioner's legal heirs challenged the Minister of Revenue's 2020 order confirming a 2016 decision that reduced the deceased's landholding, relying on precedent established in WP No.13712/2017, which requires authorities to justify any reduction in land holdings. The court ordered a de novo hearing with proper opportunity to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts