ASHOK LAXMAN BHUSARE DIED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS SINDHU ASHOK BHUSARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/9312/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030043442022

Filing Number

WP/3285/2022

Filing Date

31-Jan-2022

Registration No

WP/9312/2022

Registration Date

14-Sep-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Division

Category

SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Maharashtra Pre of Frg& Con Holding Act-1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK LAXMAN BHUSARE DIED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS SINDHU ASHOK BHUSARE

    Adv. SONAWANE MAHESH RAMNATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. R. No. 11 served.,AGP for R. Nos. 1 to 5.,JAJU NIKHIL SANTOSH FOR R.NO. 6,8,9,Resp. Nos. 6 to 9, 10/A and 10/C are served.,KAKDE YUVRAJ VIJAYRAO FOR R.NO. 11,R. NOS. 10B, 10E AND 10D ARE SERVED,IMRAN KHAN GUFTAR KHAN DURRANI FOR R.NO. 10 (A) TO 10(E) 1123

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT LAND RECORD

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT LAND RECORD

  5. 5.THE TALUKA INSPECTOR OF LAND REOCORD

  6. 6.KESHAV SAKHARAM MHASKE

  7. 7.BABAN GANPAT BHUSARE

  8. 8.BHIMABAI KESHAVRAO MHASKE

  9. 9.SHANTABAI SHRIDHAR MHASKE

  10. 10.RAJMOHAMMAD RASOOL BAIG DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIRS RAJJAK RAMOHAMMAD BAIG

  11. 11.HARSHADA DADASAHEB KAKDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad remanded a land record dispute to the Deputy Director of Land Records for fresh reconsideration. The petitioner's legal heirs challenged the Minister of Revenue's 2020 order confirming a 2016 decision that reduced the deceased's landholding, relying on precedent established in WP No.13712/2017, which requires authorities to justify any reduction in land holdings. The court ordered a de novo hearing with proper opportunity to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 22-Mar-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare

  7. 23-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. MehareView PDF

  8. 23-Jan-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  9. 05-Dec-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  10. 27-Oct-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  11. 29-Sep-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  12. 31-Aug-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  13. 20-Jul-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  14. 22-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  15. 22-Jun-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  16. 17-Mar-2023

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  17. 02-Feb-2023

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  18. 04-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  19. 04-Jan-2023

    For Orders Unserved Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  20. 30-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  21. 30-Nov-2022

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  22. 19-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  23. 19-Oct-2022

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar

  24. 15-Sep-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. G. SewlikarView PDF

  25. 15-Sep-2022

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar

  26. 11-Apr-2022

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Registrar

  27. 21-Mar-2022

    RegistrarView PDF

  28. 21-Mar-2022

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Registrar

  29. 14-Mar-2022

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Registrar

  30. 28-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 31-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9312/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad remanded a land record dispute to the Deputy Director of Land Records for fresh reconsideration. The petitioner's legal heirs challenged the Minister of Revenue's 2020 order confirming a 2016 decision that reduced the deceased's landholding, relying on precedent established in WP No.13712/2017, which requires authorities to justify any reduction in land holdings. The court ordered a de novo hearing with proper opportunity to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case