GULABSINGH GOPINATH CHAVAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/1358/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030043422024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
WP/3058/2024
Filing Date
29-01-2024
Registration No
WP/1358/2024
Registration Date
31-01-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GULABSINGH GOPINATH CHAVAN
Adv. Dighe Praveen S
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. AGP FOR R.NO 1 TO 4 (WAIVES) 1123
THE HONBLE MINISTER FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SUPPLY AURANGABAD
THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER AURANGABAD
INDUBAI SHANKAR BHUREWAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-02-2024 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 01-04-2026 | |
| 30-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 24-03-2026 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the Writ Petition filed by Gulabsingh Chavan challenging the Minister's order that restored a Fair Price Shop (FPS) License No. 74 to Indubai (Respondent No. 5). The court held that a FPS License cannot be transferred based on a Will Deed (which only becomes effective after death) or a Partnership Deed, as government policy permits transfer only in specific circumstances like succession upon death. The earlier ministerial order transferring the license to the petitioner via a partnership arrangement was found to violate the legal principle "what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly," and therefore could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the Writ Petition filed by Gulabsingh Chavan challenging the Minister's order that restored a Fair Price Shop (FPS) License No. 74 to Indubai (Respondent No. 5). The court held that a FPS License cannot be transferred based on a Will Deed (which only becomes effective after death) or a Partnership Deed, as government policy permits transfer only in specific circumstances like succession upon death. The earlier ministerial order transferring the license to the petitioner via a partnership arrangement was found to violate the legal principle "what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly," and therefore could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts