NATHA LAXMAN GUNJAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/2639/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030043222017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th February 2017

Filing Number

WP/3382/2017

Filing Date

01-02-2017

Registration No

WP/2639/2017

Registration Date

24-02-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

NATHA LAXMAN GUNJAL

Adv. Nagode Somnath D.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

09-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

27-02-2017

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

24-03-2017

FOR ORDERS - COPIES NOT SUPPLIED - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of all consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017 by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the tenure of all petitioners had been completed by 2020, rendering the petitions moot and devoid of any surviving issue for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of all consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017 by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the tenure of all petitioners had been completed by 2020, rendering the petitions moot and devoid of any surviving issue for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case