SHIAVJI GANPATI KALE Katneshwarkar P.R. vs DHONDIRAM NAMA DIKLE — WP/2394/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Feb-2021

CNR: HCBM030042952021

Filing Number

WP/3545/2021

Filing Date

30-Jan-2021

Registration No

WP/2394/2021

Registration Date

04-Feb-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )

Sub-Category

AGRICULTURAL LAND CEILING ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Hyderabad Tenancy & Agri.land Act 1950

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIAVJI GANPATI KALE Katneshwarkar P.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHONDIRAM NAMA DIKLE

    Adv. ,UNDRE VIKRAM SHIVAJI 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2394/2021 Shiavji Ganpati Kale v. Dhondiram Nama Dikle The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging land ownership. The court upheld the respondent's claim to 7 acres 20 gunthas of agricultural land, finding that a 1961 registered sale deed validly transferred portions to both parties and the petitioner's 1962 tenancy surrender was accepted. Since the transaction remained unchallenged for nearly 50 years with revenue recognition, the court ruled the ownership cannot be questioned after such an inordinate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 09-Sep-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  7. 25-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  8. 25-Jul-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  9. 11-Jul-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare

  10. 24-Apr-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare

  11. 01-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. MehareView PDF

  12. 01-Mar-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare

  13. 11-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. MehareView PDF

  14. 11-Jan-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  15. 13-Dec-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  16. 04-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  17. 04-Oct-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  18. 23-Aug-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  19. 31-Jul-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  20. 13-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  21. 13-Jul-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  22. 22-Jun-2023

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  23. 12-Jun-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  24. 20-Dec-2021

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  25. 09-Apr-2021

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  26. 05-Mar-2021

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  27. 05-Feb-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  28. 05-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 30-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2394/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2394/2021 Shiavji Ganpati Kale v. Dhondiram Nama Dikle The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging land ownership. The court upheld the respondent's claim to 7 acres 20 gunthas of agricultural land, finding that a 1961 registered sale deed validly transferred portions to both parties and the petitioner's 1962 tenancy surrender was accepted. Since the transaction remained unchallenged for nearly 50 years with revenue recognition, the court ruled the ownership cannot be questioned after such an inordinate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case