THE EX ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DEVISION LATUR vs TRIMBAK KRISHAN SHINDE L.RS VATSALABAI TRIMBAK SHINDE AND ORS — CA/3784/2008

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030041922008

Filing Number

CA/3152/2008

Filing Date

08-Feb-2008

Registration No

CA/3784/2008

Registration Date

02-Apr-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EX ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DEVISION LATUR

    Adv. BHARASWADKAR PATIL KALPALATA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRIMBAK KRISHAN SHINDE L.RS VATSALABAI TRIMBAK SHINDE AND ORS

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned Civil Application No. 3784/2008 to allow proper service of notice on respondents. The court issued notice returnable on 06.07.2026 and directed service through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, while also permitting private mode of service. The court noted the case is 18 years old. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2020

    Notification

  4. 05-Mar-2020

    Notification

  5. 21-Jan-2014

    Regular Order [ CIVIL Applications ] - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.U. Chandiwal

  6. 04-Feb-2010

    Regular Order.(unserved Notices)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.U. Chandiwal

  7. 11-Jun-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Feb-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/3784/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned Civil Application No. 3784/2008 to allow proper service of notice on respondents. The court issued notice returnable on 06.07.2026 and directed service through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, while also permitting private mode of service. The court noted the case is 18 years old. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case