Union of India T/h the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and Others GOLEGAONKAR MADHUR ANIL vs Haribhau Aaba Khatake — CA/1597/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 96. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030041642026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

CA/3096/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

CA/1597/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Union of India T/h the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and Others GOLEGAONKAR MADHUR ANIL

  2. 2.The Union of India Through General Manager

  3. 3.The Deputy Chief Engineer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Haribhau Aaba Khatake

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/1597/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case for six weeks to allow parties to take necessary steps regarding deceased and unserved respondents. The court permitted private/Humdast service of notice and extended the timeline by an additional six weeks if needed. Any interim relief previously granted continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/1597/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/1597/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case for six weeks to allow parties to take necessary steps regarding deceased and unserved respondents. The court permitted private/Humdast service of notice and extended the timeline by an additional six weeks if needed. Any interim relief previously granted continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case