JYOTI RAVINDRA SABLE DESHMUKH SHIVRAJ V AND SURENDRA V SURYAWANSHI vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS — WP/1422/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030040612024

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

WP/2850/2024

Filing Date

24-01-2024

Registration No

WP/1422/2024

Registration Date

02-02-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

JYOTI RAVINDRA SABLE DESHMUKH SHIVRAJ V AND SURENDRA V SURYAWANSHI

Respondent(s)

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS

Adv. AGHAV AVINASH D FOR R/1 AND 2,AGP FOR R.NO. 3.,R. No. 4 served.,NITIN KESHAVRAO CHAUDHARI FOR R/4 1123

THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER

THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK DIVISION

JYOTSNA ANKUSH SABALE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

06-02-2024

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

01-04-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

24-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

16-10-2025

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

22-08-2025

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and ordered reinstatement of the petitioner, Jyoti Sable, as Anganwadi Sevika. The court found that her removal from the post based on alleged non-residency in Padoshi village was erroneous, as she had submitted valid documentary evidence (Aadhaar Card, Ration Card, EPIC Card, and Gram Sevak certificate) proving her residence. The court rejected the investigating officer's vague hearsay-based findings and the disputed panchnama document, quashing both the Chief Executive Officer's order dated 06-02-2023 and the Divisional Commissioner's appeal order, directing her reinstatement within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and ordered reinstatement of the petitioner, Jyoti Sable, as Anganwadi Sevika. The court found that her removal from the post based on alleged non-residency in Padoshi village was erroneous, as she had submitted valid documentary evidence (Aadhaar Card, Ration Card, EPIC Card, and Gram Sevak certificate) proving her residence. The court rejected the investigating officer's vague hearsay-based findings and the disputed panchnama document, quashing both the Chief Executive Officer's order dated 06-02-2023 and the Divisional Commissioner's appeal order, directing her reinstatement within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case