SHAIKH VASIM AHMAD KABIR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3033/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030039752026
Filing Number
WP/2955/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/3033/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH VASIM AHMAD KABIR
Adv. PANDIT SUSHIL PUSHPENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MAHARASHTRA STATE RURAL LIVELIHOOD MISSION
-
3.THE DISTRICT MISSION DIRECTOR MAHARASHTRA STATE RURAL LIVELIHOOD MISSION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of Maharashtra (Principal Secretary) to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2026 within three months from the judgment date. The court accepted the State's undertaking made through its counsel to decide the matter within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3033/2026
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of Maharashtra (Principal Secretary) to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2026 within three months from the judgment date. The court accepted the State's undertaking made through its counsel to decide the matter within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts