General Manager Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd Bhadrawati Dist Chandrapur GIRISH SHASHIKANT RANE vs The State of Maharashtra through the Collector Beed Taluka and District Beed — FA/203/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030038142025

e-Filing Number

23-01-2025

Filing Number

FA/2936/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

FA/203/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.General Manager Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd Bhadrawati Dist Chandrapur GIRISH SHASHIKANT RANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through the Collector Beed Taluka and District Beed

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP,R/4,6 TO 13 SERVED,BHADEKAR D.R. FOR R/6 TO 13,BHAVTHANKAR VIVEK VASANTRAO FOR R/4,AGP WAIVES FOR R/1,ADV. D.R. BHADEKAR FOR R/13 A TO 13E 1123

  2. 2.Ramesh Bhanudas Shep

  3. 3.Uttam Bhanudas Shep

  4. 4.Manik Patloba Shep

  5. 5.Jyoti Babu Shep alias Jyotiram Baburao Shep

  6. 6.Baburao Gyanba Shep

  7. 7.Ashok Tulshiram Sirsath

  8. 8.Janardhan Murkinda Shep

  9. 9.Ramkishan Murkinda Shep

  10. 10.Sudam Murkinda Shep

  11. 11.Subhash Jyotiram Shep

  12. 12.Omprakash Narsing Shep

  13. 13.Ramkishan Manaji Shep

  14. 14.Dhondiram Mahaji Shep

  15. 15.Pralhad Manaji Shep(Legal Heir)15.

  16. 16.Sumanbai Pralhad Shep15.

  17. 17.Mahadeo Pralhad Shep15.

  18. 18.Vaibhav Pralhad Sanap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    Case Summary: FA/203/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Power Grid Corporation's appeal, modifying the lower court's land compensation award from Rs.77,000 per rupee to Rs.57,750 per rupee by applying a 25% deduction for development-related land requirements (roads, open spaces, layout permissions). Key Reasoning: The court upheld the trial judge's reliance on an unregistered agreement-to-sale dated 17.06.2004 (executed before notification), finding unregistered documents admissible for valuation purposes under precedent law. However, the court applied a 25% reduction acknowledging that land designated for non-agricultural development requires portions reserved for public infrastructure and planning compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  15. 06-Oct-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. MoreView PDF

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More

  20. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. MoreView PDF

  21. 02-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  22. 28-Mar-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  23. 31-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  24. 31-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/203/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/203/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Power Grid Corporation's appeal, modifying the lower court's land compensation award from Rs.77,000 per rupee to Rs.57,750 per rupee by applying a 25% deduction for development-related land requirements (roads, open spaces, layout permissions). Key Reasoning: The court upheld the trial judge's reliance on an unregistered agreement-to-sale dated 17.06.2004 (executed before notification), finding unregistered documents admissible for valuation purposes under precedent law. However, the court applied a 25% reduction acknowledging that land designated for non-agricultural development requires portions reserved for public infrastructure and planning compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case