BABURAO KADU SAPKALE SONAWANE GANESH NARAYAN AND A. N. DESHPANDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3595/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030037902026

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

WP/2821/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

WP/3595/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

BABURAO KADU SAPKALE SONAWANE GANESH NARAYAN AND A. N. DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE THROUGH THE MEMBER SECRETARY

THE GROUP EDUCATION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

23-06-2026

FOR ORDERS - COPIES NOT SUPPLIED -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

05-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: WP/3595/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 23.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to supply necessary copies within two weeks, after which notice would be issued to respondents returnable in two weeks. Interim protection already granted to the petitioner will be vacated if the undertaking is not filed by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3595/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 23.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to supply necessary copies within two weeks, after which notice would be issued to respondents returnable in two weeks. Interim protection already granted to the petitioner will be vacated if the undertaking is not filed by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case