GANGADHAR NARHARI MAMIDWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/1482/2018

Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030036432018

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/2815/2018

Filing Date

25-01-2018

Registration No

WP/1482/2018

Registration Date

05-02-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order)
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Petitioner(s)

GANGADHAR NARHARI MAMIDWAR

Adv. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Adv. AGP FOR R.NO. 1,Patale Amol N 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

08-02-2018

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

16-04-2020

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

10-06-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

07-05-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

06-05-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Case Summary: WP/1482/2018 - Gangadhar Narhari Mamidwar v. The State of Maharashtra The High Court at Aurangabad, on May 7, 2026, adjourned the case and issued a direction requiring the former Chief Officer/Tahsildar Ms. Pallavi Temkar to appear personally before the court on June 10, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. The court noted that despite an earlier notice issued on September 16, 2025, Ms. Temkar had failed to respond to the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1482/2018 - Gangadhar Narhari Mamidwar v. The State of Maharashtra The High Court at Aurangabad, on May 7, 2026, adjourned the case and issued a direction requiring the former Chief Officer/Tahsildar Ms. Pallavi Temkar to appear personally before the court on June 10, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. The court noted that despite an earlier notice issued on September 16, 2025, Ms. Temkar had failed to respond to the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case