NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD vs PRAKASH NOORA PAWAR Advocate - Nagarkar Kiran M., ,Nagarkar Kiran M. — FA/1415/2007
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 09th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030033682003
Filing Number
FA/9368/2003
Filing Date
08-Apr-2003
Registration No
FA/1415/2007
Registration Date
16-Nov-2007
Judge
Lok Adalat
Coram
Lok Adalat
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Withdrawn
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. Advocate- Kulkarni Sudhir V FOR APPELLANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAKASH NOORA PAWAR Advocate - Nagarkar Kiran M., ,Nagarkar Kiran M.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Lok AdalatView PDF
Summary: The National Lok Adalat before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) disposed of New India Assurance Company's First Appeal No. 1415/2007 following the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal. The court permitted the respondents (claimants) to withdraw the amount deposited by the insurance company plus accrued interest, as per the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's apportionment order in MACP No. 418 of 2000. Court fees paid by either party were ordered to be refunded per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2008
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
11-Jun-2008
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
09-Jun-2008
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2003
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1415/2007
Summary: The National Lok Adalat before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) disposed of New India Assurance Company's First Appeal No. 1415/2007 following the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal. The court permitted the respondents (claimants) to withdraw the amount deposited by the insurance company plus accrued interest, as per the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's apportionment order in MACP No. 418 of 2000. Court fees paid by either party were ordered to be refunded per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts