DNYANESHWAR TATERAO MALODE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/12106/2017
Case under Mah.civil Services(ser.con) Rule 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030030812017
Next Hearing
18th August 2020
Filing Number
WP/2399/2017
Filing Date
23-01-2017
Registration No
WP/12106/2017
Registration Date
03-10-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DNYANESHWAR TATERAO MALODE AND ANOTHER
Adv. Deshmukh Vijay Vasantrao
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. ,PATIL DNYANESHWAR J 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-08-2020 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 04-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Dnyaneshwar Taterao Malode seeking declaration of entitlement to old pension scheme benefits, as the issue was already decided by the Full Bench in Dilipkumar Bhagwan Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra (2019). The court noted that judgment is pending before the Supreme Court and reserved the petitioners' right to approach the court again if the Full Bench judgment is reversed or modified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Dnyaneshwar Taterao Malode seeking declaration of entitlement to old pension scheme benefits, as the issue was already decided by the Full Bench in Dilipkumar Bhagwan Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra (2019). The court noted that judgment is pending before the Supreme Court and reserved the petitioners' right to approach the court again if the Full Bench judgment is reversed or modified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts