SAGAR PREMLAL JAISWAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/118/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM030029112026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/715/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

WP/118/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227
M.p.d.a. (Act. 1981) Section 3

Petitioner(s)

SAGAR PREMLAL JAISWAL

Adv. HARSHAL PRAKASH RANDHIR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. PP WAIVES FOR R/1 TO 3 1123

The State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

11-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

07-05-2026

URGENT CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL WRIT PETITIONS)

23-04-2026

FOR ORDERS - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

30-03-2026

URGENT CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL WRIT PETITIONS)

05-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: WP/118/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted leave to petitioner Sagar Premlal Jaiswal to amend his criminal writ petition and prayers challenging a confirmation order. The court directed the State's APP to file an affidavit-in-reply by the next date; failure to do so will result in the matter being heard on its own merits. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/118/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted leave to petitioner Sagar Premlal Jaiswal to amend his criminal writ petition and prayers challenging a confirmation order. The court directed the State's APP to file an affidavit-in-reply by the next date; failure to do so will result in the matter being heard on its own merits. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case