VANDANA WD/O. BANDU MOHITE AND ANOTHER R V GORE AND A D MULEY. vs BALVINDAR SINGH S/O. BAINT SINGH AND OTHERS — FA/1000/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM030027022026

Filing Number

FA/2046/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

FA/1000/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VANDANA WD/O. BANDU MOHITE AND ANOTHER R V GORE AND A D MULEY.

  2. 2.SAURABH BANDU MOHITE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALVINDAR SINGH S/O. BAINT SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SARABJEET SINGH

  3. 3.ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. THR DIVISIONLA MANAGER

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    In FA/1000/2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the learned advocate for the appellant supply copies for issuance of notice to respondents. Notices were directed to be issued returnable on 3rd July, 2026. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/1000/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In FA/1000/2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the learned advocate for the appellant supply copies for issuance of notice to respondents. Notices were directed to be issued returnable on 3rd July, 2026. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case